These television series unpleasantly reflect the unjustified proportions of the real world, and investigating how unjust women are treated explains what happened to the protagonist of the sex scandal. Also useful. Women seeking privacy infringement justice for other image-based crimes, often referred to as “revenge pornography,” have experienced victim accusations that have long been observed in other criminal areas such as rape. I know that. In 2016, prosecutors found that in 309 rape cases in England and Wales, 13% had filed an application with the court to seek evidence of past sexual history. Despite legal bans blaming this, 8% were successful. This is almost one of the 10 cases in which a woman’s irrelevant past sexual behavior was used to damage her credibility. “Revenge porn” is a commonly used term used to describe image-based sexual abuse, according to an Australian survey. Published in 2020 If the victim is more naked in the shared image, it turns out that the victim is perceived as more indiscriminate and blameable.
In the actual story of these TV dramas, there is a strange reasoning about women’s accomplices to sex scandals that women don’t really want. Land Gotye, who stole Anderson’s sex tape, considers it a fair game because he can’t distinguish her from the porn star he’s relentlessly watching. Also, in a very British scandal, the Duke hates his wife’s actions, so he considers it a fair game. But these dramas also cleverly connect the line of not removing agencies and flaws from their heroines – again, they don’t fit into the usual good / bad girl binaries. The Duchess may be cruel, greedy and violent, but the Duchess writes fake letters in an attempt to take over her stepchild, and she performs adultery that offends her husband, two good shoes. But not. She wants to take a picture. She records her extraordinary sex life using souvenirs taken from her lovers’ clothes or by writing the coded letter “v” in her diary. The picture is part of that treasure trove, personally trapped in a drawer, as marriage worsens, husbands become more violent, and dreams of a happy future become more wasted. It makes more sense. Anderson’s home video is similar, and the recorded memories of the actress and her husband after the wedding are preserved forever. Lewinsky may not have known that he was recorded, but he believed he shared important and important information with his friends. And why? Why shouldn’t they participate in this record and collection of important sexual memories?
Shame and victim blame
For impeachment: American Crime Story, production team Said Monica Lewinsky fought to include a scene that flashed Bill Clinton’s thong. Her claim that her participation in the case is visible is important, probably because that’s not the point this series makes. It claims that the deepest kind of trust has been broken – a secret shared among friends. The incident exposed Lewinsky to her public shameful life, and she weighed her in parallel with the dynamics of unequal power that the series showed between her and the president.
Clinton may have left the marriage and presidency relatively unscathed, but he is unharmed and cannot escape the Impeachment: American Crime Story. The depiction of Clinton’s desire to control the story in his favor was constantly challenged by everything from camerawork, shifting from the handheld and unstable at the original more predatory moment with Lewinsky, and then. Stable control as she gains more agencies and distance from him, to the dialogue itself. In one episode in the middle of the season, he declares that “no one supports women better than I do,” but neither his audience nor his wife is ironic. In a later episode, Hillary Clinton told him: He and Linda Tripp are portrayed as villains, in contrast to Lewinsky (Beanie Feldstein), who is flawed but inherently likable. Viewers end this series of cheering for her much more strongly than cheering for Anderson and the Duchess of Argyll. In their series, they are allowed some feminist revisionism, but Lewinsky has been given retaliation.
