tight search network
Both developments appear to have widened the possibility of Trump’s legal exposure, leading to at least three separate investigations, including an investigation in Georgia into an alleged attempt to steal the 2020 presidential election in a key battleground state. drama, the evidence seems to be clear. The former president has denied any wrongdoing on all accounts.
But a deepening crisis for Trump also came on the day the House Select Committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 riots formally announced its first fall hearings next week. The commission has yet to decide whether to recommend criminal charges against the former president. We have already conducted our own grand jury investigation into the events leading up to.
The legal battle against Mr. Trump also adds to the possibility that the former president could face potential criminal charges and serious civil penalties, significantly threatening his fortune. Much of Trump’s initial political appeal was based on the idea that he was a hugely successful tycoon who had built a highly profitable business and amassed personal wealth. And if his career proves to be a card house built on illegal activity, his story will absorb a serious blow.
The latest legal accusations against Trump come from believing the 2024 presidential election is likely. He has already suggested that he will build on his claim that he is being politically persecuted by Democrats, and if he is formally indicted, he will be implied about violence. I am warning you.
“The Art of Stealing?”
The civil lawsuit filed by the state of New York against Trump represents the broadest catalog yet of the former president’s business practices, with three people deeply involved in the Trump Organization: Don Jr., Ivanka, and Eric. Adult children are also targeted.
“This is a massive complaint, a solid complaint, full of facts, and very serious. , will be addressed and explored to “dispute it,” Jeffrey Berman, a former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, told CNN’s Erin Burnett.
James said that civilians accused of such acts would have books thrown at them. She argued that not pursuing the case meant there were two justice systems.
“We can’t have different rules for different people in this country or state,” James said.
Her remarks were aimed directly at the vanity behind Trump’s entire political discourse: he is fighting for everyday Americans against a system that favors the elite. He’s an outsider.
“Corporate Death Penalty”
The penalties James is seeking against Trump in the likely lengthy lawsuit could at least severely limit the ability of businesses to operate, especially in US financial capital.
CNN legal analyst Paul Curran told Anderson Cooper, “She’s seeking what corporate lawyers call the death penalty for corporations, which would revoke the Trump Organization’s accreditation. We won’t even be able to do business in New York.”
“If AG wins the lawsuit, it’s a very serious penalty.”
James said he repeatedly exercised his Fifth Amendment right to self-incrimination in a sign that defending Trump could be a difficult task. In civil cases, as opposed to criminal cases, the prosecutor has the right to impose inferences against such steps.
James, a Democrat, claimed there was no political motive behind her lawsuit and that other companies have faced similar charges.
But James has created several opportunities for Trump to accuse her of political bigotry. And the almost provocative use of Trump’s slogan in her presentation announcing the lawsuit seemed somewhat triumphal. “It’s not going to be the art of trading,” she said. “It’s the art of stealing.”
Mr Trump responded immediately by calling the lawsuit a witch hunt. Trump may try to argue that his business employs the same business practices as other New York firms and that he is being unfairly picked as a former president and future candidate.
Still, the evidence uncovered in the lawsuit could swirl in unexpected directions in other jurisdictions, potentially threatening the financial viability of the business, even if it doesn’t lead to criminal proceedings against the Trump Organization. there is.
Another blow in the confidential document incident
The Justice Department’s victory in the 11th Circuit represents another legal blow to Mr. Trump as it targets the notion that Mr. Trump is immune from rules related to classified information.
The Court of Appeals not only partially stayed the lower court’s decision to stay DOJ’s review of 100 classified documents obtained from Mar-a-Lago. Officials say the documents are government property and could expose U.S. sources and methods, and even endanger secret U.S. assets. risks abroad. The ruling also wiped out claims by Trump’s legal team that the former president may have declassified the documents as president.
“The records do not contain evidence that any of these records have been declassified. And before the special master, plaintiffs have provided evidence that they have declassified any of these documents The court will examine the documents obtained in the search.
Former assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York Nick Ackerman said on CNN Wednesday that the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has dismissed Trump’s case, questioning whether the Supreme Court will take up the case if it goes that far. expressed.
“Donald Trump didn’t have proper interest in classified documents. There’s no way he has the right to have this information or see it. That’s what underlies this whole opinion.” ‘ he said.
As usual, when Trump faces legal threats, the question arises whether he faces political costs.
The former president has spent years trying to discredit any institution, including the courts that serve him. He denounces them as bigoted, corrupt and tools of liberal persecution. He also specifically targeted James, accusing her of being racist towards him. Such demagogues are now an important tool of his political brand. At rallies, he tells his supporters that he doesn’t mind being persecuted to protect them.
It is highly unlikely that the former president’s base will attack him. Still, Trump’s already declining attitude with voters in the general election that fired him in 2020 is unlikely to be compounded by even more damaging allegations about his actions. . Running the White House.
But the reality that a sitting president is protected from criminal activity may seem even more appealing to Trump now. And if he doesn’t run for office in his 2024, it will be harder to claim that the former president is politically victimized.